Accessible Synchronous Communication: Reloaded

One of the more inter­est­ing occur­rences at SxSW04 was the use of Ren­dezVous enabled iChat­ting dur­ing panel dis­cus­sions. For those of you poor souls on PCs, Ren­dezVous iChat (~AIM) lets you open up your app and see all the other peo­ple on your net­work (wire­less or oth­er­wise) that are using Ren­dezVous. So when I fired up iChat while sit­ting in the crowd, I could see about 25 or so peo­ple in the room with me, or in nearby rooms, and chat with them. It got really inter­est­ing when Jeff Veen, a pan­elist, opened up his iChat, which was dis­played on the big screen. What hap­pened is the peo­ple, rather than stand­ing up and ask­ing their ques­tions, sent them over iChat. Good ques­tions were read aloud by Jeff.

Now this seemed to be a dou­ble edged sword. It got dis­cus­sion going faster, and peo­ple who may have been too timid to stand up and ask ques­tions, were able to ask ques­tions. But it also was slightly dis­tract­ing to other pre­sen­ters to have iChat win­dow fly­ing open on the screen when they were try­ing to address ques­tions. A big­ger con­cern for the acces­si­bil­ity com­mu­nity was that one of the pan­elist, Dr. John Slatin, was unable to fully par­tic­i­pate in all aspects of the dis­cus­sion because they were hap­pen­ing silently behind him.

There is a small debate about this on Veen’s per­sonal site, but I would love to get one going here. Keep it polite, but lets debate for a while on this.

  1. Danielle says:

    Log­i­cally chat should be a very acces­si­ble tech­nol­ogy, no? Deaf peo­ple use it to replace quick con­ver­sa­tions with peo­ple who don’t use ASL. A screen­reader can read the exchanges (I assume). Looks like the prob­lem comes when you want to move a chat from two people’s indi­vid­ual com­put­ers to a full-room display.

  2. Inter­est­ing con­ver­sa­tion– the iChat con­ver­sa­tion was n’t avail­able to Dr. Slatin, but nei­ther was it avail­able to any PC users in the audi­ence. I think that at the very least, other panel mem­bers should be con­sulted– as long as good ques­tions are read aloud before being answered, it still might work– espe­cially if a tran­script of the chat ses­sion was made available.

    How­ever, I love the idea of being able to chat dur­ing a ses­sion. While it can occas­sion­aly dis­tract par­tic­i­pants from teh pre­sen­ter, it gives par­tic­i­pants some­thing to do when the pre­sen­ta­tion is bor­ing and can facil­i­tate more knowl­edge being shared among the audi­ence than the pre­sen­ter has time to give (and knowl­edge that he may not know).

  3. Jeff Coburn says:

    It seems like it would be cool if every­one was using a ren­dezvous enabled com­puter. Until then it seems like the best solu­tion might be to use an IRC chan­nel. I’m sure only a few flame wars would break out:)

  4. Joe Clark says:

    The pro­jec­tion was for the con­ve­nience of the panel host, who could see. He selected ques­tions to answer. The other text on the screen, while of inter­est, was not nec­es­sary to fur­ther the panel discussion.

    Also, no, chat mode is not easy to make acces­si­ble to screen-reader users.