Accessible hi-fi designs

Hav­ing just sat through an amaz­ing panel here at SXSW on hi-fi css designs, I struck me that the for-profit world is now ahead of the non-profit/educational world in acces­si­ble design. Sites like Wired, For­tune, and Espn are way more acces­si­ble and standards-based than 99 per­cent of the government/non-profit/education world. I think they main cause of this is sim­ply money. Good design­ers demand the kind of money only the busi­ness world can afford; busi­nesses can afford to do com­plete redesigns; busi­nesses react to its mar­ket faster than gov­ern­ment ser­vices because it means more money for them.

I do think that the same shift will hap­pen in the do-gooder world, but it may be dri­ven by dif­fer­ent forces. Hope­fully not user out­cry or law­suits, hope­fully a desire to pro­vide a bet­ter expe­ri­ence will drive it

  1. Hal Kemp says:

    You make some inter­est­ing points. I think that in order for acces­si­bil­ity to become the norm, that it needs to be dri­ven by money, par­tic­u­larly in the for-profit world. I see your point about good design­ers; of course it depends on how “good” is defined with respect to design­ers (some/we may argue that you are only good if you design to stan­dards; oth­ers may dis­agree), and how to get those design­ers who might be tal­ented (but not good in our def­i­n­i­tion of the word) to become more inter­ested in acces­si­ble design. How can money drive acces­si­ble design? Those sites that you men­tioned (Wired etc.) have had their designs com­pleted by acces­si­bil­ity gurus, but what about Bank of Amer­ica, CNN, EBay, etc.? I am not quite sure how money is driving/will con­tinue to drive most of the major com­pa­nies to com­ply, other than hir­ing those pre­em­i­nent design­ers like Veen et al.

  2. Jeffery Coburn says:

    My name is Jeff Coburn, too!