Comments on: Accessible collaborative documents http://curbcut.net/accessibility/accessible-collaborative-documents/ open and accessible Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:34:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Kenny Page http://curbcut.net/accessibility/accessible-collaborative-documents/#comment-173 Kenny Page Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:43:16 +0000 http://curbcut.net/2005/02/accessible-collaborative-documents/#comment-173 Guys - not wanting to rubbish the whole idea, especially as i'm posting long after discussions have started, but.. Would it not be more beneficial to build an open source web accessibility verification tool similar to the old offline Bobby java application? If you think back, the wider web design community *used* to have a tool, now they don't. Guys - not wanting to rubbish the whole idea, especially as i’m posting long after discussions have started, but..

Would it not be more beneficial to build an open source web accessibility verification tool similar to the old offline Bobby java application?

If you think back, the wider web design community *used* to have a tool, now they don’t.

]]> By: Christopher Phillips http://curbcut.net/accessibility/accessible-collaborative-documents/#comment-172 Christopher Phillips Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:54:29 +0000 http://curbcut.net/2005/02/accessible-collaborative-documents/#comment-172 Jeff- I think you've made a good choice with the Word Doc, but you may also want to reconsider a wiki. There would be some setup, but it condenses the steps of download, turn on track changes, edit, save, send back to author to just edit and save online- and most types of wiki software have good tracking features built-in. Jeff- I think you’ve made a good choice with the Word Doc, but you may also want to reconsider a wiki. There would be some setup, but it condenses the steps of download, turn on track changes, edit, save, send back to author to just edit and save online- and most types of wiki software have good tracking features built-in.

]]>